.


  Modules
· Home
· Editorial
· Features
· Forums
· k2
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Topics
· Web Links
· Your Account

  Who's Online
There are currently, 705 guest(s) and 65 member(s) that are online.

You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here

  Sponsors

wangchukhotel

Sued company stonewalls court summons

home Chhundu-Oberoi Case Update 9 February, 2010 - The country’s first foreign direct investment (FDI) court case between Oberoi groups ltd. against Chhundu travels remains tangled in deadlock.

The Oberoi groups has refused to respond to the three summon orders issued by the Thimphu district court. The last order was sent last month.

In July 2009, Chhundu travels, which had entered into an agreement with the Oberoi groups, a leading hotel luxury brand in India, to jointly begin a Nu 1.17 bn pair of luxury hotels in Bhutan, sued Oberoi, for allegedly withdrawing from the agreement.

The case, which was filed with Thimphu district court, has not budged an inch.

Sources said the Oberoi had asked a law firm in India, Khaitan and co., to research and look into the joint venture case in August 2009. Speculation has it that Oberoi has filed a court case against Chhundu in New Delhi. The company’s spokesperson has not responded to Kuensel on the issue.

Former high court lawyer, Cheda, was also asked to study the case by the Oberoi groups and to represent them in court. He has not heard from them since September 2009.

A memorandum of understanding (MoU) between the two companies was signed in November 2006 to build two five star hotels in Paro and Thimphu. The plan was to build one hotel at Chengaydaphu, Thimphu, spread over a 15 acre area, and the other near Drugyel high school in Paro on a 14 acre plot.

Khendum Dorji, who started Chhundu travels in 1986, said that she has not heard from the Oberoi groups at all after the court case was filed.

Many judiciary officials, however, feel that the district court has no jurisdiction over this FDI case, as a clause in the MoU signed by Oberoi and Chhundu states that the agreement is governed by Singaporean law and, therefore, the centre for arbitration or to resolve disputes is Singapore.

Chhundu had consulted while signing the MoU a corporate lawyer in India, who said that although the MoU is governed by Singaporean law, the law can be applied everywhere, said Khendum Dorji in an earlier interview.

“There is a possibility that Oberoi might have filed a case in India because, from what we hear, the applicable law governing the MoU is Indian law,” said a Bhutanese lawyer.

By Phuntsho Choden


 
  Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.

  Related Links
· More about home
· News by chencho


Most read story about home:
Last option ?


  Article Rating
Average Score: 5
Votes: 1


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Excellent
Very Good
Good
Regular
Bad


  Options

 Printer Friendly Printer Friendly


Sorry, Comments are not available for this article.
copyright @ Kuensel Corporation