KuenselOnline

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2014 - 8:07 AM
Yangphel Housing Banner.gif

Not yet decided

ZOOM: + - Reset

Gyalpoizhing Land Case: As of last evening most of the defendants who were sentenced in connection with the Gyalpoizhing land allotment case were yet to decide whether to appeal the verdict passed on March 8.

National Assembly Speaker Jigme Tshultim said he cannot comment since he was still waiting to receive his verdict from Mongar. “I haven’t seen the verdict,” he said last evening when contacted over telephone.

The 511-page verdict was given to the Speaker’s representative, who said that he would be sending it today through the home minister’s legal representative.

The trial court sentenced the Speaker to two and a half years in prison for deception and official misconduct.  He was found guilty of violating Na 1-2 of Thrimzhung Chhenmo, which constitutes offenses of forgery, deception, and impersonation. The speaker also failed to abide by His Majesty’s kasho issued on March 31, 1987, and the allotment criteria and guidelines that works and human settlement ministry set.

Lyonpo Minjur Dorji could not be contacted for comments but his legal representative, Jamyang Sherab Wangdi, who is coming to Thimphu today from Trashigang, said he needs to discuss with Lyonpo whether to appeal or not. Lyonpo Minjur was given one year sentence for not exercising his responsibility with due diligence while allotting plots in Gyalpoizhing town.

Former municipal building inspector and member secretary of Gyalpoizhing land allotment committee, Dechen Singye, who was given one year sentence for violating Na 1-2 of Thrimzhung Chhenmo, said that he hasn’t decided yet. “I lack legal background I don’t know whether I have grounds for appeal,” he told Kuensel. “Even if I appeal to higher court I don’t have confidence.”

He was found guilty of allotting a plot to his sister Dechen Zangmo, who was not eligible.

Other 13 plot allotment committee members between 2005 and 2006, when Lyonpo Minjur Dorji was the dzongda, were also sentenced to a year in prison, with the option to pay thrimthue in lieu of prison term.

Former chimi of Mongar town and also the plot allotment committee member, Namgangla, said that although he was not satisfied with the verdict, which gave him the same prison term as the chairman, he would follow Lyonpo Minjur. “If the home minister appeals I will also do the same,” he said.

Meanwhile, people have already started introspecting the Gyalpoizhing case, Phojikha land case and the Thimphu taxi parking ownership.

“The nature of all three cases are same,” a legal expert said.

By Rinzin Wangchuk with Dechen Tshering in 

Mongar

4 Comments to “Not yet decided”
  1. jiguschos | March 11th, 2013 at 18:14:43

    How do you deal with frustration? you may blame the first person you see, misplace your anger on him. But what good does that do, are you not causing the same anguish you have gone through. Try to understand the true cause of your frustration don’t just jump on the first blame wagon you see. I ask you, did my dad giving land frustrate you that much??

  2. pp66 | March 11th, 2013 at 15:38:34

    The ACC has done it’s best by splitting the beans but the verdict is too lenient. many people thought that the ACC could not catch the big fish. The ACC has not failed in catching fish of any size but ACC’s associates like the court and OAG has failed to do their job. May be due to fear or threat from those big shots.

  3. Choegi Gyalpo | March 11th, 2013 at 13:46:53

    Daho Gembo la! What about the plots allotted to all those ineligible applicants like Lynpo Yeshi Zimba,Lyonchen Jigme Y Thinley and so on la. I think the plots should be taken back by the government and whatever amount they paid for the plot should be forfeited, and those people should be also penalized or sentenced for certain terms.

  4. kokky | March 11th, 2013 at 12:50:23

    long awaited court verdict is already out……..final match between ACC Vs Lyonpo minjur and NA speaker jigme tshelthrim came in result with bail for one year yet it still say not yet decided.may be one or two year bail is not enought for them is it?????????????????????????

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.