Home / News / Rapist gets 8 years, 9 months and 9 days term

Rapist gets 8 years, 9 months and 9 days term

Crime: Lhuentse dzongkhag court sentenced a 29-year-old man to eight years, nine months and nine days in prison for raping a 16-year-old girl and impregnating her in December 2013.

The court found Sonam from Umgar guilty of statutory rape. According to section 183 of the Penal Code of Bhutan, a person shall be guilty of the offence of rape of a child above the age of twelve years if the defendant has sexual intercourse with a child between the ages of 12 to 18 years.

The girl had given birth to a child in the campus and was abandoned which was seen by one of the school cooks. The cook took the infant to the Lhuentse hospital and informed the police.

Sonam told the court that he met the girl during the annual tshechu of Kisa Bee in the winter vacation 2013. A relationship developed and that it was consensual sex they had.

According to the verdict the underage girl was raped and gave birth to a child under difficult circumstances.

Sonam also paid the girl Nu 20,000 compensation.

Sonam is from Tsirang and is a painter. He has 10 days to appeal.

By Tashi Phuntsho, Mongar

Check Also

Former gup and land record officer convicted for illegal land transaction

Even as the Election Commission of Bhutan (ECB) conducts the by-election for gup in Chang …

One comment

  1. 1. Sonam told the court that he met the girl during the annual tshechu of Kisa Bee in the winter vacation 2013. A relationship developed and that it was consensual sex they had.

    2. According to the verdict the underage girl was raped and gave birth to a child under difficult circumstances.

    Looking at the above statements, any sensible person can conclude there is BIG CHASM between reality and perception. That inflicts pain on rest of the living, not finding relation between the two. In whose favour is the Judgement: the girl who consented for sex, the man that committed the act with her or the most innocent baby that was ABANDONED by own mother who is the main VICTIM in the sight of sensible person? Whose interest does the VERDICT serve that may nurture and mould the society?

    What if the man was enforced the responsibility of being father and woman made to play the role of mother after she has BABY of her own? Why insist to call her CHILD when she has her own baby to call CHILD now? Sometimes rules exalting itself and overshadowing nature seem to be the cause of obscurity to mental health of society.

Leave a Reply